User contributions for Irruptive Creditor
Appearance
A user with 2,516 edits. Account created on 2 April 2019.
16 June 2024
- 00:4400:44, 16 June 2024 diff hist +10 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
- 00:4100:41, 16 June 2024 diff hist +6 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tag: Visual edit
15 June 2024
- 20:3720:37, 15 June 2024 diff hist +51 m Supreme Court of the United States →Individual rights: Case names are italicized. current Tag: Visual edit
- 20:3420:34, 15 June 2024 diff hist +80 Supreme Court of the United States →Individual rights: No idea why Blackman's background info was removed Tag: Visual edit
- 19:4219:42, 15 June 2024 diff hist +70 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 19:3719:37, 15 June 2024 diff hist +4 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 19:3619:36, 15 June 2024 diff hist +23 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 19:0619:06, 15 June 2024 diff hist −3 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 19:0219:02, 15 June 2024 diff hist −2 m Garland v. Cargill Grammar Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 19:0019:00, 15 June 2024 diff hist +1 m Garland v. Cargill ‘taken aback’ not ‘taken back’. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 16:2616:26, 15 June 2024 diff hist −3,974 Talk:Comstock Act of 1873 No edit summary current Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 16:1916:19, 15 June 2024 diff hist −247 m Bump stock Cargill case had nothing to do with the Second Amendment and entirely dealt with statutory interpretation. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 16:1416:14, 15 June 2024 diff hist +41 m Garland v. Cargill Addded APA as law applied since this concerned an agency action Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 16:0816:08, 15 June 2024 diff hist +7 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 16:0516:05, 15 June 2024 diff hist +8 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 16:0316:03, 15 June 2024 diff hist −45 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 16:0116:01, 15 June 2024 diff hist +179 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:5515:55, 15 June 2024 diff hist +42 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:5215:52, 15 June 2024 diff hist 0 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:5215:52, 15 June 2024 diff hist +1 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:5115:51, 15 June 2024 diff hist +66 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:5015:50, 15 June 2024 diff hist +17 m Garland v. Cargill Removed U.S.C. citation since it’s a non-positive law title and therefore the underlying should be what’s cited as per the House Office of the Legislative Counsel. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:4615:46, 15 June 2024 diff hist +178 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:4115:41, 15 June 2024 diff hist +3 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:4015:40, 15 June 2024 diff hist +8 m Garland v. Cargill Added ‘Justice’ before KBJ’s name. Not sure if this was intentional, but’s she just as much a Justice of the Supreme Court as are the rest. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:3815:38, 15 June 2024 diff hist +30 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:2715:27, 15 June 2024 diff hist +192 m Comstock Act of 1873 No edit summary current Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:2215:22, 15 June 2024 diff hist +41 m Comstock Act of 1873 No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:1715:17, 15 June 2024 diff hist +514 m Comstock Act of 1873 No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:1015:10, 15 June 2024 diff hist −35 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:0815:08, 15 June 2024 diff hist +21 m Garland v. Cargill Reworded “transform into a machinegun” to the phrasing “were machineguns as defined under the NFA” as federal law consider machinegun conversion devices themselves to be MGs (attached or not) as per the definition: “The term shall also include…any part designed and intended solely and exclusively… use in converting a weapon into a machinegun…” Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:0215:02, 15 June 2024 diff hist −1 m Garland v. Cargill Removed duplicate “ Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 15:0015:00, 15 June 2024 diff hist +17 m Garland v. Cargill Specified which law, since the definition of machinegun has been amended multiple times Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 14:5814:58, 15 June 2024 diff hist +7 m Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 14:5814:58, 15 June 2024 diff hist +25 Garland v. Cargill Added name of district judge Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 14:5714:57, 15 June 2024 diff hist +26 Garland v. Cargill Replaced instances of ‘ban’ with final rule, since in this context it matters that this was an agency action as opposed to legislative action Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 14:4114:41, 15 June 2024 diff hist +34 Garland v. Cargill IRC is the common name for title 26 Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 14:2414:24, 15 June 2024 diff hist −134 m Garland v. Cargill Added additional source for Trump statements. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 14:1914:19, 15 June 2024 diff hist +6 m Garland v. Cargill Undid garbage edits Masem which removed any organization to the opinion section (like removing a summary to replace it with a garble of quotes), completely deleting the Alito concurrence portion, and etc. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 14:1514:15, 15 June 2024 diff hist +3,971 Garland v. Cargill No edit summary Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit
- 08:0308:03, 15 June 2024 diff hist +95 m Garland v. Cargill →Background Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5907:59, 15 June 2024 diff hist +13 m Garland v. Cargill →Dissenting opinion Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5207:52, 15 June 2024 diff hist +4 m Garland v. Cargill →Reactions Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5107:51, 15 June 2024 diff hist +2 m Garland v. Cargill →Reactions Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5107:51, 15 June 2024 diff hist +10 m Garland v. Cargill →Majority opinion Tag: Visual edit
- 07:5007:50, 15 June 2024 diff hist −61 m Garland v. Cargill →Reactions Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4907:49, 15 June 2024 diff hist +7 m Garland v. Cargill →Reactions Tag: Visual edit
- 07:4907:49, 15 June 2024 diff hist +814 m Garland v. Cargill →Reactions Tag: Visual edit
- 07:3407:34, 15 June 2024 diff hist +2,894 Garland v. Cargill Reactions Tag: Visual edit
- 06:5806:58, 15 June 2024 diff hist 0 Garland v. Cargill →Alito Concurrence Tag: Visual edit