Index | 8 reviews in total |
This movie kept me involved and entertained from beginning to end. Most
of its conventions are drawn from film noir, albeit it might better be
describes as a comedy of the absurd. With better distribution, it could
become a cult classic.
Peter Dinklage is the hapless hero, struggling through the depths of
Hollywood sleaze to get the $10,000 he needs to ransom his elderly dog.
His buddy, played by Mark Boone Junior, has greater ambitions; but
despite life and alcohol induced craziness, genuinely is a true friend.
Dinklage, as usual, is extraordinary, and his role is written so that
his dwarfism is not even among the top five traits shaping his
fully-formed character. If you are tired of the usual pap and want
something to stimulate your brain as well as your senses, find this
film.
This movie has all the elements of an old Film Noir: a missing person
(well, dog), a mysterious woman, a voice-over narration by the main
character (nicely played by Peter Dinklage), and a slightly convoluted
main plot. The message; whether it is in fact a deeper look at the
machinations of Hollywood (and the good and the bad that goes with it)
or not, is not as important as the overall atmosphere.
The bits that feel just too far out and too unrealistic are more than
made up for by both the excellent cast and the road trip/generally
trippy vibe that seems reminiscent of the Big Lebowski.
It's certainly not for everyone; bring some time and willingness to go
with the flow. Then it's a gem of a movie that is well worth a watch
-and a re-watch.
This is one of those films you hope that YOU will be the discover of.
The quirky oddity you will recommend heartily to friends. Great cast.
Great characters. Some pretty funny dialog. Plot... not so much. A
little too convoluted.. just a bit, though. Peter Dinklage is always
great. The entire cast is great. The female love interest, new to me,
is really the female equivalent of what I wanted this movie to be; my
secret discovery. She's lovely.The character actor, I recognize but
can't name, who plays Buscemi's buddy was particularly good.
It's one of those films that could have been better but, not being an
expert, I am not sure what it needs. I liked it though.
I knew practically nothing about "Pete Smalls Is Dead" when I started
watching it, which made it even more of a treat. Peter Dinklage plays a
man who goes to LA to attend the funeral of a deceased friend...but
discovers that there's more to his friend than just the death.
After watching the movie for a few minutes, I got the feeling that it
could easily be a Coen Brothers movie (although it has a different
director). The quirky characters and presence of Steve Buscemi --
wearing a curly blond wig! -- give it that feeling.
"PSID" isn't any kind of great movie, but it's certainly worth seeing.
Pretty fun. Also starring Mark Boone Junior, Rosie Perez, Lena Headey
and Michael Lerner.
With a cast like this that alone should make for a pretty interesting
movie, but unfortunately that is not the case and it is a rather
forgettable tale.
So forgettable in fact that I forgot I had already seen it a couple
years back and didn't realise until when I (re)watched it today 30
minutes in when Steve Buscemi shows up in an awful blonde afro wig that
I had indeed seen it before.
It's supposed to be a comedy, but it's just not particularly funny. And
in the end when the "mystery" is solved (I say that lightly because
it's pretty obvious and it's not a mystery movie as such) in retrospect
the script is rather stupid as well.
I made sure to write a review and rate it this time around so I don't
have the misfortune of possibly watching it again in a couple of years
when I very possibly would have forgotten about it all over again.
A very weak 4/10 from me, it would have been less if not for Peter
Dinklage and Theresa Wayman.
Caught this movie on cable by accident, and I'M SO GLAD I DID! this adorable film is everything cult-classics are made of, and i'll never understand why more people didn't love it as much as i did. Yes, i know how to punctuate properly, but touchscreen keyboards are a total pain in the buttocks and i hate them. The acting was exemplary, the script and direction were fun, quirky and understatedly hilarious (i love deadpan humor, am i the ONLY one who does? Really? Okay. Sadface.). A special added bonus for Game Of Thrones fans; this is probably the first time peter dinklage and lena headey acted together, and IT IS WONDERFUL. My tastes aren't like everyone else's because most people are boring and dumb, but personally, i love this movie so much that whenever it comes on cable (which isn't nearly often enough), i take the day off work (i can do that because i'm cooler than you, ha ha) just to get drunk and watch it again. Gonna buy it as soon as i figure out how to make amazon show me the movies i own on a touch-tablet, i don't know why amazon won't give me my movie library on a new machine, does anyone else? Amazon can bite me, but if you want a fun buddy- movie that's not-quite-like the buddy movies you've seen before, or if you're an aspiring filmmaker, or if you love game of thrones, or if you're a human with a functioning brain, you should probably go ahead and give an hour of your life th check this movie out. I loved it.
This film was certainly not what I expected it to be. Luckily, it was
much more than that.
I stumbled across the title while searching for a film with Peter
Dinklage, whose style I really do enjoy. Here he plays a hapless
laundromat owner, who needs to find ten thousand dollars to recover his
near-blind dog from a loan shark who had him taken as collateral on
unpaid debts.
This is what starts a dark comedy written with pacing, style and tropes
taken from old film noirs. An original idea, that does deliver the
goods. Helping the success are the characters, very human with their
many flaws and thus also very practical comedy vehicles.
As the film ends, the style has been enjoyable, the cheerfulness
despite of all the sad smudge has been constant, and the open-minded
viewer will be happy that they spent their time on this unfortunately
forgotten piece of film.
I watched it because I'm a fan of Peter Dinklage's work. He was fine in
this film. I loved the voice over storytelling. But I'm not a fan of
Hollywood films about Hollywood. At least not fiction films about
making films in Hollywood.
If this sounds convoluted, well yeah, it is and so is this film. I
really can't fault any of the actors; I think for their part they were
all believable in their roles. The story was just boring.
It's listed as a comedy that is dark, quirky and cynical. Well they
certainly got the cynical part right but cynicism without humor is an
exercise in tedium. I guess the quirky part is Steve Buscemi, another
actor I enjoy, in a beige/blond curly clown wig looking like he'd been
smoking 40 packs of cigarettes a day. Steve is usually great with the
wry humor and quirky character portrayal; sadly, his character was
pathetic. In fact all the characters were sad and pathetic.
I found myself skipping ahead every few minutes and then watching a few
minutes and then skipping ahead. I didn't miss anything. You know it's
like watching a soap opera every single day for three months and then
missing the soap opera for a couple months; when you start watching
again you realize Joan is still in the coma, Frank is still having the
affair, and Cassandra is still making trouble for all of them.
This was 94 minutes of watching Peter Dinklage's character, KC Munk,
trying to drum up 10k to get his much beloved dog back from the loan
shark that took it to cover the debt. Munk spends the entire film
riding on the back of a moped while his friend "Shemp" peddles him from
place to place trying to either secure the 10k or get his stolen script
back so he can sell it to get his 10k so he can get his dog back. I
just couldn't care about the characters even though they spoke in soft
and meaningful tones, it just didn't get me there.
I don't like the system Netflix uses, the like or dislike, but I'm
going to have to only give this two stars even though I like the
actor's performances I hated the story and I wouldn't recommend it to
anyone. For IMDb I always double whatever I rate on Netflix; so my IMDb
rating is FOUR stars ~ PhaedraBlue 03/10/14 ~
Ratings | Awards | External reviews |
Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
Your user reviews | Your vote history |